Project logo, entitled "Block vs. Traditional: Secondary Special Education Students' Performance in Block vs. Traditional Schedules"

Skip Navigation

Up Blk Sch Abstract ProjectStaff Detailed Abstract Resources ResearchSample

Sample

Project staff selected a random sample of Wisconsin secondary schools that have used a block schedule for the previous four or more years and a random sample that used a traditional schedule for the previous four or more years. Both traditionally scheduled schools and block scheduled schools were stratified according to size (small, medium and large) prior to sample selection. For purposes of this study, "small schools" are those enrolling 299 or fewer students; "medium size schools" enroll 300 - 699 students; and "large schools" enroll 700 or more students. Twelve schools were selected during the 1999-2000 school year, and eight additional schools were selected during the 2000-2001 school year using the same procedures.

The study focused on 12th graders because the block schedule sample experienced that approach for their entire secondary education, and because student and district records will include nearly four years of data on variables of interest. From the sample schools' pool of twelfth graders, project staff drew a random sample of special education students stratified across exceptionality categories and a random sample non special education twelfth graders. From the pool of educators serving the twelfth graders in the sample schools, project staff selected a random sample of staff, stratified across block and traditional schedules and across employment roles: teaching (academic, vocational and special education); administration; counseling; and paraprofessional (educational assistant/support staff). Figure 1 summarizes the sample used in this study.

Figure 1

Sample for Block vs. Traditional Study

Student Sample

(These individuals completed or otherwise ended their secondary experience during/at the close of the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 school years.)

 BLK. SCHED.    Sp Ed*   Non Sp Ed  TRAD. SCHED.     Sp Ed*    Non Sp Ed

Small (5 sites)      11           62           Small (7 sites)      21          93

Medium (4 sites)   22           75          Medium (2 sites)    10          49

Large (3 sites)      51          107          Large (3 sites)       45         74   

Total n/category 84           244                                            76           216

*Sp Ed is defined as a student who receives special Education Services

Total special education n = 160; total non special ed n = 460; total student n = 620

Staff SampLE

Following Block Schedule 

                        Sp. Ed.     Acad.   Voc. Ed.    Admin.  Coun.   Ed. Ass.   PE

Small (5 sites)     11          22       12            1           5        0           2

Medium (4 sites)  13          13        7             3           4        4           0

Large (3 sites)     14          15      14             2            5       4           0

Totals [Blk]      38            50       33                6             14        8              2

 Following Traditional Schedule

                      Sp. Ed.      Acad.    Voc. Ed.     Admin.   Coun.   Ed. Ass.   PE

Small (7 sites)     8         23       16             3           3           3           3

Medium (2 sites)  3           9        2              1           1           1           1

Large (3 sites)     8         16       12              2           3           3          3

Totals [Trad.]     19          48        30                 6              7             7            7

TOTALS/CAT.      57          98       63                12            21           15           9

Total staff  n = 275


H324C990018 is funded at 100% by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Field Initiated Studies, from July 1, 1999 – June 30, 2002 @ $175,383 for project year three, $531,121 total. The project received a no-cost extension through June 30, 2003. Principal Investigator: Brian Bottge, Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Co-Principal Investigator: John Gugerty, Researcher, Center on Education and Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison.